🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and parents are observing closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of nations are considering similar restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our children's childhood". A law may be formalized soon.
• Norway is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban remains "an measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on lawmakers to approve a proposal raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has recommended families to block their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is granted. While it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a solid starting point," said one MEP behind the resolution.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but insisting any action must be "based on strong research".

Previously, momentum grew behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the administration committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. An organization founded by the relatives of a young person who died after viewing harmful platform posts suggests that a strict age ban might not protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are safe and age appropriate for children," commented a influential peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, legislation is mostly happening at the regional level amid federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a law barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed bills requiring guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from some individuals to follow this path, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Outside of these regions, further countries are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, world organizations strike a more measured stance. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve user protection.

Even as this global conversation continues, the policies of Australia and others demonstrate that states globally are less and less prepared to wait for platforms to act voluntarily.